CONTRIBUTIONS

to

THE NATURAL HISTORY

of the
  
  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

by

LOUIS AGASSIZ

Second Monograph

In Five Parts. - I. Acalephs in General. - II. Ctenophorae. - III. Discophorae. - IV. Hydroidae. - V. Homologies of the Radiata.

With Forty-Six Plates

Volume III

BOSTON:
LITTLE, BROWN AND COMPANY.
LONDON:
TRÜBNER & CO
.

1860.

301 + 34 pages with  27  plates and 115 woodcuts.

This electronic edition prepared by Dr. David C. Bossard
from original documents in the library holdings of
Dartmouth College, Hanover New Hampshire.

December, 2005.

Copyright © 2005 by David C. Bossard.

NOTE: If the woodcut legends are too small to read easily, you may view high resolution (400ppi) images at text-figures. These images are listed by page number and figure number.

Preface  v  v  vi  vii

VOLUME III

CONTENTS.

PART I.

ACALEPHS IN GENERAL

Jellyfish
hydra


CHAPTER I.

HISTORY OF OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE ACALEPHS.


SECTION 1. Period of Aristotle and the Roman naturalists.  003  004  005  006  007
We find unquestionable evidence in Aristotle's History of Animals that he knew the Radiates now called Acalephs by systematic writers, though this name was applied by the ancient Greeks to the Actiniae as well as to the Acalephae of zoologists. Pun added nothing to the information of his predecessors, except a few remarks on the movements of the Medusae. p. 3-7.

[004] The Acalephs include the so-called jelly-fishes or sun-fishes, and the animals allied to them. ...When we first observe a jelly-fish, it appears like a moving fleshy mass, seemingly destitute of organization; next, we may observe its motions, contracting and expanding, while it floats near the surface of the water. Upon touching it, we may feel the burning sensation it produces upon the naked hand, and perhaps perceive also that it has a central opening, a sort of mouth, through which it introduces its food into the interior.

SECTION 2. The Naturalists of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.  007  008  009  010  011  012
Rondelet is the chief' investigator of this period; his observations on Medusae disclose the same accuracy of observation and the saute penetration as his other investigations on all the natural productions of' the Mediterranean. Gessner deserves to be studied chiefly on account of his great erudition, and Rondelet for his deep insight into the relations of animals. p. 7-12.

SECTION 3. The naturalists of the eighteenth century.  013  014  015  016  017  018
Linnaeus gives character and importance to the study of Natural history, by the publication of the "Systema Naturae." His pupils and followers explore the world in every direction. p. 13-18.

SECTION 4. The systematic writers and anatoinists.  018  019  020  021  022  023  024  025  026  027
In the beginning of the nineteenth century the Acalephs begin to be made the subject of special investigations. Péron and LeSueur, and, twenty-five years later. Escherholtz, mark two great epochs in this progress. p. 18-27.

SECTION 5. Embryological researches upon Acalephs.   029  030  031  032  033  034  035
l'he investigations which have led to the knowledge of the modes of reproduction and growth of the Acalephs are among the most interesting ever made by naturalists. Sars and Steenstrupp are most prominent among the discoverers in this field, and, next to them. Siebold, l)alyell, and Dujardin. p. 28-35.


CHAPTER II.

ACALEPHS AS A CLASS.


SECTION 1. Mode of determining the natural limits of the class. 
036  037  038  039  040
The study of the structure of animals, unless combined with a knowledge of their mode of development and of their homlogies, is not sufficient to trace the natural limits of the classes.  p. 36-40.

SECTION 2. The different animals referred to the type of Radiates.  041  042  043  044  045  046  047  048  049  050  051  052  053  054  055  056  057  058  059  060  061  062  063  064
The great diversity of opinions among naturalists respecting the relations of the lower animals to one another, has chiefly arisen from a confusion of ideas as to what constitutes affinity or analogy. p 41-64.

SECTION 3. The classes of Radiata.  064  065  066  067  068  069  070  071  072
There are only three classes among Radiata, the Polyps, the Acalephs, and the Echinoderms; and these are characterized by the different modes of execution of the plan of their type. p. 64-72.

> Acalephs, Polypi, Echinoderms

SECTION 4. Morphology and nomenclature.  073  074  075  076  077  078  079  080  081  082  083  084  085  086  087
Natural range of homologies with reference to the necessity of introducing new names when new ideas are discussed, and, if possible, of establishing a connection between the nomenclature and the objects under consideration. p. 73-87.

SECTION 5. Individuality and specific difference among Acalephs.  088  089  090  091  092  093  094  095  096  097  098  099
Importance of studying the question of individuality in connection with that of the limitation of species, p. 88-99. Darwin's views on the origin of species considered from this side of the question, note p. 99.

SECTION 6. Natural limits of the class of Acalephs. 
099  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113
Though gradually extended farther and farther, the limits of this class have not yet been sufficiently expanded to include all the animals which are now believed to belong to it. p. 99-113.

SECTION 7. Gradation among Acalephs.  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124
Simple as the structure of the Acalephs is, it is sufficiently complicated readily to point out the relative rank of the different types belonging to the class. p. 113-124.

SECTION 8. Succession of Acalephs.  125  126  127  128  129
The order of succession of the Acalephs in geological times can thus far only be traced in one of their types, the Tabulata, through a long series of formations. p. 125-129.

SECTION 9. classfications of Acalephs.  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149  150  151  152
Before the beginning of this century, nothing was done towards classifying the Acalephs. Lamarck first unites together the majority of their representatives; then follow the classifications of Péron and LeSueur, of Cuvier, of Schweigger, of Goldfuss, of Chamisso and Eysenhardt, of Latreille, of Eschscholtz, of DeBlainville, of Oken, of Brandt, of Lesson, of Forbes, of Lütken, and of Milne-Edwards. More recently embryological researches have greatly influenced the views of naturalists respecting the affinities of the Acalephs, and there have appeared new classifications proposed by Vogt, Kölliker, Leuckart, Gegenbaur, McCrady, and Huxley. The study of the homologies is likely to modity these views anew. p. 129-152.




PART II.

CTENOPHORAE


CHAPTER I.

CTENOPHORAE IN GENERAL

SECTION 1. Structural features of the Ctenophorae in general.  155  156  157  158  159  160  161  162  163  164  165  166  167  168  169  170  171  172  173
Special homologies traced among all Acalephs, in order to show the peculiarities of the structure of the Ctenophorae. Natural attitudes and normal position of the Acalephs. p. 155-173.

[`56] Ctenophorae are free Acalephs moving in various ways, their main axis being generally turned in the direction of their onward motion.

SECTION 2. Subdivisions of Ctenophorae forming suborders. 
174  175  176  177  178  179  180  181  182  183  184  185  186
Critical analysis of the systematic value of the different names under which the different kinds of natural groups observed among Acalephs have been designated. p. 174-186.
 
CHAPTER II.

THE NATURAL FAMILIES OF THE CTENOPHORAE

SECTION 1. Family characters in general among Ctenophorae.  187  188  189  190
As in all classes of the animal kingdom, the natural families of the Acalephs, and those of the Ctenophorae in particular, are characterized by particular patterns of form, determined by structural features bearing upon form. p. 187-190.

SECTION 2. The natural families of the Ctenophorae Eurystomae.  190  191  192  193
Three families may be distinguished in this sub-order: the Beroidae proper, the Neseidae, and the Rangiidae. p. 190-193.

SECTION 3. The natural families of the Ctenophorae Saccatae.  193  194  195  196  197  198
This sub-order embraces also three natural families: the Mertensidae, the Cydippidae, and the Callianiridae, p. 193-198; while the Cestidae, p. 198, constitute a sub-order by themselves. p. 292.

SECTION 4. The natural famillies of the Ctenophorae Lobatae.  199  200  201  202
Five families may now be distinguished in this sub-order: the Euramphaeidae, the Bolinidae, the Mnemiidae, The Calymmidae, and the Oeyroidae. p. 199-202.

CHAPTER III.

NORTH AMERICAN CTENOPHORAE


SECTION 1. The genus Pleurobrachia and its species.  203  204  205  206  207  208  209  210  211  212  213  214  215  216  217  218  219  220  221  222  223  224  225  226  227  228  229  230  231  232  233  234  235  236  237  238  239  240  241  242  243  244  245  246  247  248
Natural limits of the genus. Its form and structure; the bulk of the body consists of gigantic cells; their arrangement; the locomotive flappers; the circulation of fluids; the tentacular apparatus; the lasso-cells of the tentacles illustrated by Prof. H. J. Clark; other structural details. p. 203-248.

SECTION 2. The genus Bolina and its species; with remarks on allied genera.  249  250  251  252  253  254  255  256  257  258  259  260  261  262  263  264  265  266  267  268  269
Characters of the genus; comparison with Pleurobrachia ; the ambulaeral tubes and the locomotive flappers have not the same extent; the whole chymiferous system and its ramifications differ in different types of Ctenophorae, p. 249-269. Genus Mnemiopsis, p. 269.

SECTION 3. The genus Idyia and other true Beroids.  270  271  272  273  274  275  276  277  278  279  280  281  282  283  284  285  286  287  288
Differenee between Beroe and Idyia as genera. The species belonging to each. Description of the species most common along our coast. Its structure, p. 270. Idyopsis, p. 288.

SECTION 4. Tabular view of the Ctenophorae known at present. 
289  290  291  292  293  294  295  296
Systematic enumeration of all the Ctenophorae thus far described, with their principal synonymes, p. 289-296.

SECTION 5.Geographical distribution of the Ctenophorae.  297  298  299  300  301
First attempt to define the faunae of the sea by the Ctenophorae found in different parts of the world; distinction between faunae and zoological zones. p. 297-301.


Plate Descriptions 302-327  302  303  304  305  306  307  308  309  310  311  312  313  314  315  316  317  318  319  320  321  322  323  324  325  326  327

PLATES



#
Click for plate at 100 ppi
DESCRIPTION
01


Plate at 200 ppi

description
02


Plate at 200 ppi

description
02a


Plate at 200 ppi

description
03


Plate at 200 ppi

This plate is
a foldout:
top at 100ppi
top at 200ppi
bottom at 100ppi
bottom at 200ppi


description
04


Plate at 200 ppi

description
05


Plate at 200 ppi

description
05a


Plate at 200 ppi

description
06


Plate at 200 ppi

description
07


Plate at 200 ppi

description
08


Plate at 200 ppi

description
09


Plate at 200 ppi

description
10


Plate at 200 ppi

description
10a


Plate at 200 ppi

description
11


Plate at 200 ppi

description
11a


Plate at 200 ppi

description
11b


Plate at 200 ppi

description
11c


Plate at 200 ppi

description
12


Plate at 200 ppi

description
13


Plate at 200 ppi

description
13a


Plate at 200 ppi

description
14


Plate at 200 ppi

description
15


Plate at 200 ppi

description
16


Plate at 200 ppi

description
17


Plate at 200 ppi

description
18


Plate at 200 ppi

description
19


Plate at 200 ppi

description